Jens Lorentz

My feedback

  1. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    It would be great to define rules, which are C-rule related to the time dimension but at the same time B-rule to all other dimensions in the cube.
    (So we target consolidated elements in time dimension and base elements in all other dimensions)

    With this we could define advanced semi-additive aggregation behaviour, which is currently not provided by Jedox (e.g. NonEmptyAverage)

    Right now we only have some basic semi-additive aggregation in Jedox.

    In general it would be really powerful to define rules, which are targeting consolidated elements in some selected dimensions and base elements in all other dimensions.
    (not only related to time aggregation)

    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    The current option to define output columns in cube extracts is a good start.

    But loking deeper it is very limited, as you cannot remove dimensions, which are used in the dimension filter.

    So the definition of output columns is applied before the dimension filter is executed.
    This is the wrong order!
    You need many dimensions just for filtering - but not as ouput in the cube.
    So please Jedox team switch the execution order:
    1st. apply dimension filter
    2nd. apply output column definition

    thanks a lot!

    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  3. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Jedox Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    also nice-to-have:
    an integration in a source code management system, e.g. GIT or Subversion

    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    one addition:

    if you set a default value for the output of the function incas of null,
    then of course there should not be any warning anymore in the log

    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  6. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Jedox Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    Started in 2014 .. still not available .. great performance guys ;)

    addionally to user based settings a standard alias for the whole dimension should be configurable in the modeller

    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Jedox Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  12. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Knowledgebase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  15. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Jedox Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    definitely needed!! .. as a lot of formatting is done conditionally.

    If you need to change conditional formatting globally because of new style guides,
    then you need to change each report individually, which is a nightmare.

    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  18. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
    Jens Lorentz shared this idea  · 
  19. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Jedox Feature Voting Tool » Jedox Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jens Lorentz supported this idea  · 
  20. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jens Lorentz commented  · 

    Maybe it is better to split the processes into mutliple projects.

    ..and Jedox could more support/strengthen a workflow composition across different projects.
    (as they are already doing in certain cases - e.g. with external jobs or central settings)

    More support here would be imaginable: e.g. external extracts, better tracking of external usage of a job, import/export of multiple projects in one step ..

← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base