Ideas

For the new Natural Language AI capability that is being developed. A very power concept would be to leverage a Speach to text capability to create the input. This would allow someone to easily leverage Jedox via a mobile phone to get a result. "S...

MS Excel doesn't allow to set an array formula (e.g. PALO.SUBSET, but also non-Jedox arrays) on a cell range with merged cells. Jedox Web Spreadsheet does accept input of array formula on a range with merged cells, but the output will then - depen...

The dropdown to select cube in the "Data Filter" tab of Subset Editor lists all cubes in the current database, even those which don't contain the dimension for which the subset is created. Using a cube without this dimension doesn't make sense, an...

Right now, you can only do one at a time. It would be great if there was a method to select multiple/groups of workbooks to either mark with a tag, or set resources

What it is: Scale performance, while having more dimensions in the database/ cube. Challenge: While having more dimensions (14-17) to the cube, runtime for complex logics, especially consolidation rules are timing out. Use Case: Matrix Consolidati...

Add data validation to the attributes listed in the Add Element form when popup form is selected. It should be activated when using "cell range" as the target to populate the form. If there is data validation on that cell, it should use that data ...

Currently the outcome leads to confusion

Instead of having to add a separate JedoxDatabase load to jobs involving Jedox Cubes, add this option to the main settings fields in the Cube load. I have many times run jobs that update data to Jedox Cubes where I forgot to manually update rule t...

Currently, the planning assistant is only enabled one selecting one cell and the undo capability is not part of the Planning Assistant. It will be really nice to include Undo capability to the Planning Assistant and allow users to apply it to mult...

In the Picklist we have the option to add extra elements. I would like to propose the option to also being able to deselect from a feature similar to this. This will make removing technical members from dropdowns, like "~" and many others, simpler.