In complex planning situations, separate rules calculating identical cube areas are required, using CONTINUE and STET statements. This has the advantage of separating out logic branches to make calculations easier to read in the Rules Editor in Modeler. The downside is that tracing a cell with overlapping rules can be very difficult to understand, as the logic can be buried in deep branches in the visualisation. There needs to be an easier way to trace/display rules for the exact rule that is being applied to a cell in this situation.
Thank you for your great idea. While we cannot commit to a specific target version, we will consider adding it to our future internal backlog. If you can add further information about the context of this feature, please add it here so we can evaluate it more fully.