Skip to Main Content
Jedox Ideas

Let us know how we can make Jedox even better!

Status Future Consideration
Workspace Jedox Platform
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 2, 2019

Don't show _internal_suite in the list of users

The _internal_suite user gets everyone confused. Every client that is a bit less technical worries about it ("Does it take a license", "What if we delete it", "What if the password is changed" and so on and on). There is absolutely no need that I can see to have _internal_suite shown in the list of users. If it's something that Jedox needs internally that's fine, but please don't expose it to users.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 27, 2023

    I agree. This often leads to confusion. So it would be helpful, if this is not shown. One Question would be, what about the Salesforce Connection Use? According to the knowledge base, the _internal_suite user has to be assigned to the salesforce license to use it. So the user needs to be shown in the user list, atleast in the license tab.

    Since it is not possible to delete or deactivate that user by mistake, it would already help if the user is not automatically assigned to a license. The need/no need of license for this user is usually the biggest question from clients.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 10, 2020

    This is an good idea. While we cannot commit to a specific target version, we will consider adding it to our future internal backlog. If you can add further information about the context of this feature, please add it here so we can evaluate it more fully.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 2, 2019

    maybe optionally show supervision server service as well (hidden by default)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 2, 2019
    Good point, Ben. Chris, what would be the use of showing the svs and _internal_suite accounts OPTIONALLY? Even administrators should not 'touch' them. It's a system configuration that may be part of the CONFIGURATION cube, but even that I doubt will ever be useful.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 2, 2019
    I think making it optional or via a different interface "system internals" (or something like that) would be the right thing. Showing it as part of the standard "user management" (users, groups, roles) is really where the problem is in my opinion.